Because of the dependency between factors of information system evolution, ANP is used. The roadmap consists of flowchart of migration and migration-decision model that is supported with criteria of evaluation form for assessing system’s baseline and making a consistence decision by Neutrosophic-ANP. This paper proposes a roadmap for migration-architecture. The paper provides static and dynamic analysis for monolith, SOA and MSA by numerical-comparison and Benchmark. The paper addresses the lack of evaluation ERPs in post-implementation phase.
The paper answers “when architecture transform”, “to which architecture migrate” and “how”. The difficulty of the adopting architecture increases in inconsistence case as in SOA and MSA. Unfortunately, the selecting a suitable architecture is a hard mission. These systems generally focus on internal processes but may include transactions with customers and suppliers.The selection of the system-architecture is critical step in software-engineering lifecycle. Moreover (Laudon and Laudon, 2007), integrated applications help companies become more productive and flexible, to coordinate their business processes more closely and integrate the process groups, focusing therefore on the efficient management of resources and customer service.Īs shown by Laudon and Laudon (2007), the integration of systems into a single software to manage all key business processes enables a company to make information flow without discontinuity across the organization. Several definitions from different authors are described below.Īccording to Laudon and Laudon (2007), there is a tendency, especially in large organizations, to use applications or integrated systems, i.e., systems that encompass all functional areas, implement business processes across the company, and include all management levels. The first step in meeting the goals of this study is providing a clear definition of what an ERP system is.
0 kommentar(er)
